All's Red that's Riding Hood

  • Img_3498
    "All's Red that's Riding Hood" by Terrance V McArthur Directed by Heather Parish Rogue Performance Festival, Fresno, CA. March, 2008. Alicia Buss, James Sherrill, Tom Nance, Randi Saul Olson.

Woodward Shakespeare 2006

  • Thehorror
    Woodward Shakespeare Festival's Plays of 2006. I did the lighting design for Midsummer Night's Dream and Macbeth.

Enchanted April

  • Copy_2_of_100_0351
    Ice House Theatre, Visalia, CA Kristin Lyn Crase, Linnea George, Brooke Aiello, Tom Nance, Craig Wilson, Chase Darwin, Randi Saul-Olson, Jeni Watson. . . . and me. Lights and set by yours truly and LeeAnn Burnett.

The Turn of the Screw

  • Tots_072
    The Turn of the Screw by Henry James Adapted by Jeffrey Hatcher Directed by Heather Parish October, 2005 Ice House Theatre, Visalia. Brooke Aiello (The Governess) Thomas Nance (The Man)

ArtsJournal: Daily Arts News

Blog powered by TypePad

« November 2007 | Main | March 2008 »

February 28, 2008

Letting it Go

Last night's preview went exactly the way I foretold it would.  Everyone was focused and drove elegantly through their actions.  The pacing was right on and the training took over.  It was the final step I needed to feel as though I could let the show go.

As a director, my previous casts and those I work with regularly know that I am NOT one of those directors who holds onto a show indefinitely.  I stop giving individual notes unless I see egregious errors.  And I rarely give ensemble notes except on keeping focus and pacing.  I figure that what could be fixed has been fixed.  The flaws are lessons I'll carry with me into future productions (such as learning better how to handle stage combat).  But if I've done my directing as well as I know how and my actors have conscientiously crafted their moments, the show will have legs. 

And it does.  I believe it has achieved what it wanted to be:  a Shakespearean fairy tale with some thought and a lot of heart. 

(Now lets hope the audiences agree!)

February 27, 2008

Final Dress and Preview

Tonight is our final rehearsal and we've invited a few folks to come in and see what's happenin'.  We're still in our rehearsal space so we'll be sans lighting, but we had our tech cue to cue and tech run on Sunday and it went really well, all things considered. 

What needed considering was the fact that I was told at the beginning of the process that i'd be working in a 3/4 round and so we staged the piece for that.  Arriving, though, the space was missing the chairs to the sides of the playing space-- apparently they had to remove them because a dance troupe also using the space has more people than they first told them. 

So, my actors braved up and played to the front after I had drilled 3/4 round movements in them.  The advantage, I suppose, of using Viewpoints techniques is that the actors become confident enough in their movement in a space that they can accommodate almost anything.  All four of the actors showed a terrific knowledge of how to use the space and move within it in that one run.  The technical director of the venue noted how well they adjusted to the change. 

Last night, though, we worked with the actual weaponry they were going to use.  And that went okay, I believe.  The actors seem okay with it.  They were a rough two run throughs, though.  But I know its all there.  They just seemed to be wigged by the end of the rehearsal process.  I know tonight will be a focused run. 

So now we're just moving through it and I'm in the process of letting this project go and getting my next project underway.  The costumes are officially done-done, which excites me to no end because I've been hankering to start my new Elizabethan doublet!  Huzzah!

February 22, 2008

University bans student production of "Assassins"

from Insight Higher Education: 

Worried About Guns? Ban a Campus Musical

             
       
     
      

After the Virginia Tech murders a year ago, Yale University banned the use of stage weapons in a student theatrical production — infuriating actors and educators who believed audience members could distinguish drama from real life. After a few days of ridicule, Yale backed down.

A year later, after another gun tragedy, college officials are still trying to figure out how to make their campuses safe — and theater still is a target. A student production of Assassins, the award-winning musical, was to have premiered Thursday night at Arkansas Tech University, but the administration banned it — and permitted a final dress rehearsal Wednesday night (so the cast could experience the play on which students have worked long hours) only on the condition that wooden stage guns were cut in half prior to the event and not used. Assassins is a musical in which the characters are the historic figures who have tried to kill a U.S. president.

Robert C. Brown, Arkansas Tech’s president, issued a statement explaining the decision as follows: “All of us have a healthy respect for the freedom of artistic expression that college theater represents, and all of us agree that out of respect for the families of those victims of the tragedies at Northern Illinois University and Virginia Tech, and from an abundance of caution, it is best at this time not to undertake a campus production that contains the portrayal of graphically violent scenes.”

While faculty members involved in the program declined to comment on their views, others said privately (citing fear of offending administrators) that they viewed the decision as an overreaction and one that sent the wrong message about theater, the role of art, and free expression. The local newspaper reported that the administration was so concerned about the production that reporters were barred from the dress rehearsal. Adding to the anger of many on the campus is that the film American Gangster, featuring plenty of blood and violence — and none from singing historical figures — was screened on campus this week. Why, many want to know, is musical theater being singled out?

Further frustrating faculty members, there have been reports of gun shots — and a recent shooting injury — at parties organized by Arkansas Tech students, but the students organizing those parties were reportedly football players, not thespians. Some questioned why what they see as a false concern (fake guns in drama) was getting attention, as opposed to what they view as more serious problems. Others said that they viewed an order to stop a play as a violation of academic freedom.

One professor who asked not to be identified said “there seems to be a real double standard — this just feels wrong.”

Susie Nicholson, a spokeswoman for the university, said that the play could yet be rescheduled, so it was not really being called off. But others on campus noted that student productions, relying on the time of students who have a range of commitments, can’t just be pushed back a few months. Asked who made the decision to call off the play this week, she said “the administration,” but then added that the decision had been made “in conjunction” with some faculty members.

Nicholson said that the decision did not limit artistic expression, noting that the president’s statement included his support for artistic freedom. She said she did not know if any of the officials who made the decision had ever seen a production of Assassins, but said that they were concerned about the gunshots that are part of the play and might be heard outside the auditorium.

Ardith Morris, a professor of theater who was directing the production, said she could not comment on her feelings about the decision, and could only answer questions of fact. She said that a total of 60 students had been involved in the production — counting actors, the orchestra and technical crew. When the decision was made to call off the production, she said that she asked if the president wanted to brief the students, but that offer was declined in favor of her doing so. She said the news brought “tears and outrage” from students.

Morris has taught and directed student productions for 26 years at Arkansas Tech. Asked if she had ever called off a show previously, she said, her voice breaking, “never — including the show that opened the week my husband passed away.” Even facing a personal loss, she said, “theater people” wouldn’t call off a production. “It’s just not what we do. Theater is who we are — it’s how we view the world and realize ourselves as people.”

Kurt Daw, dean of fine and performing arts at the State University of New York at New Paltz, and a past president of the Association for Theater in Higher Education, said he was disappointed to hear about a college refusing to let a play go on as scheduled. Daw said that he would understand Northern Illinois University not wanting such a show right now, but that beyond the immediate vicinity, administrators should recognize “the theater’s capacity to heal and to make us think.” He noted that while Assassins is about assassins, it is by no means a pro-violence play but a work that “calls on us to think about the violence in our culture and what the sources are for it.”

Theater productions appear “more prone to censorship” on campuses than are books or professors’ writing, Daw said. He thinks this is because “what’s powerful about theater is its immediacy.” But to Daw, that’s no reason to keep theater away from students — even in difficult times. “I think academic freedom absolutely covers artistic events the same way it covers writing,” he said. Some theater may frighten those who watch it, he said, but that reaction may be entirely the point. “I’m in favor of trusting audiences.”

      

Scott Jaschik

February 20, 2008

Waking Up

Typically, when a photographer or reporter from a local paper comes in to get coverage of a play, it totally screws up the rehearsal.  Everyone's mojo is off, their focus is out of whack, and they can't seem to remember perfectly routine details of the script from the night before.  It's like every actor to hit the stage is suddenly a single celled organism.  It's exhausting.

Not for this group, however.  The photog from the South Valley Bee came in tonight, we ran the show from the top, and it was as though someone flipped a light on inside this cast.  While it was unnerving for some of them and others took it off the cuff, everyone was firing on all cylinders.  Their focus and energy was revved up and their responses were spontaneous, clear and germane. 

Suddenly, I didn't have to give the speeches I intended to give regarding active listening, making your words and actions land on their objects, and keeping buoyancy in their speech.  It was all there.  Even the second run through without the photographer was very good, solid and compelling.

We also got some fittings done on the costumes (I have just to put together two shift dresses for the ladies and they're done).  Sunday is our tech run through and the weaponry will be finished by then as well (I hope) and we'll be able to do our last three run throughs without any major hitches. 

February 19, 2008

One guy on Theatre Education

http://praxistheatre.blogspot.com/2008/02/theatre-school-in-age-of-compliance.html

From my blogroll. 

I loved most of what this guy has to say, except the part about "For instance, instead of providing a bunch of “mainstage productions” where young people passively do the bidding of the faculty, get the hell out of the way and turn the stage over to the students. Let them follow their passions, let them experiment, let them stink up the place if necessary – the air clears in no time, and none of it is carcinogenic."

I think the right to stink up the place should be earned. (I believe that in both students and practitioners). There are some basics that mainstage productions teach students-- like how to listen, react with spontanaeity, and how to be a leading player as well as a supporting one.  Students have to learn that before they can run amok with their own work.  But otherwise, I think this guy's right about the current state of arts education. 

February 16, 2008

Rehearsal Progress

Well, we've only got two weeks of rehearsal left for "All's Red".  They really are going well and the cast is working very hard to make every moment count.  I think that it will be a good solid 45 minutes in seats, but I am at the point where I may be too close to really know. 

As I've reviewed my notes, though, I see that there are a number of things we've actually worked on and improved during the course of rehearsals.  We still have some things to work on, but it is encouraging to look back and see from where we've come. 

Here are some items that aren't specific notes from the show, but are rather notes to myself on creating style in theatre.  It's a hard, ephemeral thing to cultivate and is as much a product of the collaboration of actor, script, and director.  Here are some thoughts I've written down in the course of the last two months of working on the show:

If the gesture is separated from the truth of the character's circumstance and inner life, it produces artificial posturing. 

Style is content; a physical gesture is an emotion.  The actor must understand it and illustrate it in the truest fashion possible. 

Style is the distinctive way a production communicates.  It is "knowing the play you are in". 

All great acting, no matter the style, begins with a truthful inner life, an incandescence and brightness.  Any style or expression must maintain a connection to inner truthfulness-- even in its most mannered forms.
 

And, scrawled across an entire page in my notebook:

How is your art in your life?  And how is your life in your art?


A question for us all, I guess.