All's Red that's Riding Hood

  • Img_3498
    "All's Red that's Riding Hood" by Terrance V McArthur Directed by Heather Parish Rogue Performance Festival, Fresno, CA. March, 2008. Alicia Buss, James Sherrill, Tom Nance, Randi Saul Olson.

Enchanted April

  • Copy_2_of_100_0351
    Ice House Theatre, Visalia, CA Kristin Lyn Crase, Linnea George, Brooke Aiello, Tom Nance, Craig Wilson, Chase Darwin, Randi Saul-Olson, Jeni Watson. . . . and me. Lights and set by yours truly and LeeAnn Burnett.

The Turn of the Screw

  • Tots_072
    The Turn of the Screw by Henry James Adapted by Jeffrey Hatcher Directed by Heather Parish October, 2005 Ice House Theatre, Visalia. Brooke Aiello (The Governess) Thomas Nance (The Man)

ArtsJournal: Daily Arts News

Blog powered by TypePad

November 22, 2008

lightening the load

Recently, with the changes in my production schedules, life, work, blah blah, I've decided to discontinue this blog.  I'll still have it online for posterity's sake, but I figure I can blog my little heart out at the main blog just fine-- especially since I'm inconsistent about it these days.  I'm also deleting my St. Henry's blog and backing off the Valley Theatre Reviews (I'm just posting my recommended play-going there).  Between my regular blog and the Woodward Shakes blog, I think I'm good. 

Heather

November 14, 2008

But what I really want to do is direct. . . musicals!

This amusing blog is from Steven Wells at the Guardian UK.  His analogies may be a little flawed, but his point is well taken.  I used to be a late 80's early 90's indie kid. . . but by the time I started working a real job I began to see the value in a little escapist pop-- and its theatrical counterpart.  As long as it is good escapist pop-- or a good escapist musical-- I'm all for it! Believe me. . . after Hamlet last summer, all I wanted to do was sit in a darkened theater and watch "Mamma Mia!"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2008/nov/14/indie-high-school-musical

Don't let indie kids kill off the musical

Why do some critics want High School Musical 3 to accurately reflect adolescence? If I wanted angst I'd listen to the Smiths

High School Musical 3: Senior Year

Much more fun than sitting weeping in your bedroom ... High School Musical 3: Senior Year

As you may know, the release of High School Musical 3 in the US prompted a number of viciously negative reviews from critics. Apparently these reviewers were shocked and sickened that the film didn't focus more on the grim reality of being a boring indie kid.
"This corporate Disney universe is ... free from all the exquisite pain and hopeless boredom that made being a teenager real," said a typical review in the Philadelphia Metro.

Well of course it is. It's a musical. And what teenager in their right mind would pay good money to see their own dull-as-hell, miserable, acned, bullied, sexually frustrated and songless reality authentically replicated on film? Oh, indie kids. Right.

You see, the reviewer's cynicism shares the creeping menace of the indie mentality. Having already destroyed one art form - alternative pop music - Morrissey's grandchildren, the shock troops of self-obsessed and willfully underachieving middle-class miserabilism, are setting out to destroy another, the musical.

They must be stopped. Ask yourself this: Would Oliver! have been a better movie if they'd cut out the dancing and instead given us a realistic portrayal of child prostitution in mid-Victorian England? Would Finding Nemo have been improved by the aquatic hero getting caught, gutted and flash-fried in butter in the first reel? Would The Sound of Music really have benefited had My Favourite Things been replaced by a grittily realistic look at the inside of a Nazi concentration camp?

And yet when it comes to a film about adolescence - probably the most God-awfully miserable period in anybody's life - critics chastise it for being fake and fun?

My own experience of adolescence ran like this: total nerdy crapness rescued by the dementedly joyous, empowering and politicised rollercoaster ride that was punk rock. Which was just like High School Musical 3 except with better songs and more spitting. And then came the New Romantics. Which was even more like High School Musical 3. And then it was all Adam and the Ants and Two Tone and Dexy's Midnight Runners, and that was exactly like High School Musical 3 except with mass unemployment and politics.

And then the Smiths ambled along and everything turned to utter rubbish forever. For the next three decades indie pop was dominated by moping white self-obsessives droning on about how cool it was to be depressed and - by implication - how utterly ghastly it would be to live in a world where everybody was happy and danced all the time and was forever bursting into catchy song.

So here's a choice. Press button A and you flush all miserable, self-flagellating, woe-is-me, apparently-never-heard-any-black-music indie pop into a black hole and out of the universe for ever. Or press button B and you kill Winnie the Pooh. Which button do you press?


October 25, 2008

Seth's Blog: Be careful of who you work for

Seth's Blog: Be careful of who you work for

The above is from Seth Godin's blog-- a guy who is pretty famous in the lil ol' cyberworld for his marketing ideas, and stuff like that.  I think this post offers some good reasons for being picky about with whom you choose to work in the theatre.  And perhaps more importantly, it brings to mind the question of the type of person we are when people work on our own projects.   

Blogged with the Flock Browser

October 03, 2008

Branagh and "Thor"

My current minor annoyance:

Entertainment writers who write about Kenneth Branagh being in negotiations to direct Marvel's upcoming "Thor" movie with a not-very-well-desguised sneer and reverse snobbishness.  "He's known for Shakespeare! Can he do comic book heroes?"   

Hmmmm. . . , a story about a cocky young noble who is on the outs with his deified father, who descends to a lesser world to learn a few lessons, and is reinstated as a trusted heir when he proves his ability and  humility and subsequently becomes a great leader of men and a loyal comrade to his brothers in arms? 

Wow. . . I'm really not sure a Shakespearean can handle that storyline. 

July 04, 2008

A Moratorium on Shakespeare?

I know I've been posting a lot from the blogosphere lately, so forgive me for continuing to do so.  But this post from Praxis Theatre in Canada is directly pertinent to my work at the Woodward Shakespeare Festival. 

A theoretical moratorium on Shakespeare productions is 'proposed' and a very interesting discussion ensued in the comment section.  It eventually points to why some artists (and audiences, I imagine) avoid Shakespeare like the plague and offers some little insight about how artists producing classic works need to up the ante.  Below are some highlights from the discussion that I felt useful for me as an artist working with a Shakespearean company:

First from the initial post (which is, of course from another post at the Guardian UK):

"Every Shakespeare revival should treat the play as if it was brand new and the ink barely dry on the page, and until that happens and we have worked out how Shakespeare really can be our contemporary in 21st century Britain, maybe we should do him a favour and give him a rest.”

and then excerpts from the comments (seriously, go read them all. . . they're at turns amusing and intelligent):
a moratorium would prevent all of those productions that do treat Shakes with a breath of new life. It seems like a step towards a helpful idea, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

 stop picking stuff that's been made into movies over and over again, and I think we might see more interesting Shakespeare stuff.


The problem is that (most of) the artists hold the same depth of interest in the work as the audience. When the artists are basing their interpretations of Shakespeare on the reactions they have to other interpretations they've seen (i.e. the movies and legions of stuffy stage productions) rather than their reactions to the actual words, what can we expect but a downward spiral?


See, this is where we tread into touchy ground for me, because I'm as much in favor of supporting new work as the next guy, but 'new work' doesn't have to equal 'new words'. You can do new and innovative work in so many ways alongside of producing new plays.. . .Bottom line for me is a moratorium on shitty productions

There's a lot more bad art being created than good. Always has been, but history tends to forget the bad. It also serves to follow that this means there is a reason Shakespeare has survived. It's not the material, it's the artists reviving it. Give (dis)credit where it's due.

Though I wonder, is there anything about Shakespeare, in particular, that fosters the creation of bad art? Is it because it's so good that most people try and fail? Is it because it's so good that people assume its genius to be self-evident and therefor work less hard to unlock it? Or is it because some practitioners are attracted to Shakespeare's readymade audience, and those kinds of practitioners are more interested in making money than art?  (I have to chuckle at this one-- how many of the regional Shakespeare Festivals in North America are making a significant amount of money, I wonder?~Heather)

If you don't find Shakespeare accessible in the least, then you shouldn't be doing Shakespeare (not that I'm assuming you are). And that's not a value judgment; artists should create in the manner that best speaks to them. Too many artists are more concerned either about selling the Shakespeare crowd or doing some overblown idea of capital-T theatre (and nobody is more capital-T than Willy) than what they truly feel is a necessity to the spectrum of the theatrical world.

Some of the most moving times I've ever had at a theatre has been at Shakespeare plays. I've personally put a moratorium on Dream, R&J, Comedy of Errors, & Tempest; yet I broke it recently to see Tim Supple's Dream, and I regret never seeing Jonathan Crombie play Romeo at Stratford.

It doesn't seem like a ban is in order, just more artists doing like I am and not immediately jumping to direct/act in it. It is a different style, like the Greeks, and all too often the text seems to be at the mercy of some grand concept.
*****

So, what is it about Shakespeare that either makes people want to ban it or embrace it?  And how can we keep it from being "overcooked and sauced up like a bad entree", in the sentiments of Geoffrey Tennant on Slings and Arrows? 








June 30, 2008

Theatre Blog Reading- June 30

Below are some interesting posts in the theatre blogs I've read recently:  Read and consider. . .

As I See It:  Why We Need Critics

Criticism should not need ethical guidelines

Be Quiet! We're Making Progress!

Push/Pull: The Bitter with the Sweet

June 09, 2008

2nd Annual WSF New Playwright Competition

A modest little competition, but last year it yielded some decent results.  You don't have to be a resident of the San Joaquin Valley to enter or win, but hey. . . it sure couldn't hurt if you were!
********

Woodward Shakespeare Festival

New Playwright Competition

*Finding, encouraging and developing new playwrights in the Central Valley.*

 

The Woodward Shakespeare Festival is committed to fresh and forward productions of William Shakespeare’s genius. Anywhere, at any time, however, there could be another Shakespeare sprung upon us. In that vein, the WSF announces its 2nd Annual New Playwright Competition. The objective of this competition is not necessarily to find the next great play, but to encourage the next great playwrights.

 

Prize: $150, mounting of production for Rogue Performance Festival 2009 in Fresno.

Submission Deadline:

August 30th, 2008

Submission Guidelines:

  • Festival-length plays only
  • 2-3 characters. 45-60 min run time. Approximately 30-50 pages in proper manuscript format
  • No musicals
  • No collaborations
    • Single authorship only.
  • No adaptations
    • (EXCEPTIONS: Adaptations based on or inspired by Shakespearean plays or other classical/literary texts. Adaptations of work published after 1900 will not be accepted to avoid copyright violations).
  • Scripts must be in a Standard Play Manuscript Format.
  • Electronic submissions must be sent in either Microsoft Word or Rich Text Format. PDF documents also allowed.
  •  Hard Copy submissions must be three hold punch and soft bound in a flexible cover. Hard copy submissions will not be returned to the author.
  • Original, unpublished, never before produced work only
  • Please include your completed application and bio with your manuscript submission.

 

Submissions must include the following to be considered complete:

  • Properly formatted manuscript
  • Completed Application Form

 Manuscripts can be sent to:


WSF New Playwright Competition

                                                                491Lincoln Avenue

Dinuba, Ca 93618

wsf_literarydesk@inbox.com


Download the full guidelines and application:

Download WSFNewPlaywrightComp.doc

Download WSFNewPlaywrightComp.pdf



June 08, 2008

Theatre Code of Ethics. . . still greatly needed

This item has been making the rounds in the blogosphere over the last week and a half.  I saw it last week, but didn't get the chance to post it for my local readers.  Dating back to 1945, it still resonates today.  Now, probably more than ever in my experience.  The manifesto was written by actress Kathleen Freeman, who died in 2001 when she was appearing in The Full Monty (her number in that show, by the way, is my very favorite musical comment on showbiz, and I want to develop it for a musical audition piece).  She was only 24 years old at the time of the writing and she was establishing the the Circle Theatre in Los Angeles.

In the last few weeks, topics of conversation about local professionalism have been a theme in my theatrical life.  I know that it may seem like an oxymoron "local professionalism".  Most local actors are not theatrical professionals.  They have jobs and to many of their family members and friends, theatre is an all-consuming "hobby". 

But the fact is that whenever your hobby OR your livelihood depend upon so many people working in congress together, a code of ethics and professional behavior is absolutely necessary to get the job done. Without it, the periphery feelings muss up the whole picture-- thus emphasizing the importance of rule number 8:  "I shall forego the gratification of my ego for the demands of the play."

But even where ego isn't involved, sometimes the need for such a list comes from the bad habits and juvenile approach to the work of some actors (and directors, and designers. . . ).  I was lucky enough to have come across a book in my second year in the theatre department at College of the Sequoias, "An Actor Behaves" by Tom Markus.  I still reread the book regularly and pull from it for my cast contracts. 

But most other young or new actors to the scene don't have someone outlining this stuff for them.  They don't understand how the lack of a professional code of ethics diminishes the show and their appearance in it.  If they ever do come to understand, it may be too late. 

So I say to all of my local readers. . . please take what Ms. Freeman had to say seriously.  Consider this list.  Order a used copy of An Actor Behaves.  Then start making your own code of conduct for your productions.  It may seem like you're putting restrictions on something that is supposed to be "fun".  But the fun in theatre doesn't come getting to do what you want-- that's what vacation is for.  The fun in theatre comes from putting on exemplary, compelling work filled with professionalism. 

Props to Geoff Short for the article find. 
*****

A 1945 Code of Ethics for Theatre Workers Surfaces

Foreword to the Code

“A part of the great tradition of the theatre is the code of ethics which belong to every worker in the theatre.  This code is not a superstition, nor a dogma, nor a ritual which is enforced by tribunals; it is an attitude toward your vocation, your fellow workers, your audiences and yourself.  It is a kind of self-discipline which does not rob you of your invaluable individualism.

“Those of you who have been in show business know the full connotation of these precepts.  Those of you who are new to show business will soon learn.  The Circle Players, since its founding in 1945, has always striven to stand for the finest in theatre, and it will continue to do so.  Therefore, it is with the sincere purpose of continued dedication to the great traditions of the theatre that these items are here presented.”

The “rules” follow:
1.  I shall never miss a performance.

2.  I shall play every performance with energy, enthusiasm and to the best of my ability regardless of size of audience, personal illness, bad weather, accident, or even death in my family.

3.  I shall forego all social activities which interfere with rehearsals or any other scheduled work at the theatre, and I shall always be on time.

4.  I shall never make a curtain late by my failure to be ready on time.

5.  I shall never miss an entrance.

6.  I shall never leave the theatre building or the stage area until I have completed my performance, unless I am specifically excused by the stage manager; curtain calls are a part of the show.

7.  I shall not let the comments of friends, relatives or critics change any phase of my work without proper consultation; I shall not change lines, business, lights, properties, settings or costumes or any phase of the production without consultation with and permission of my director or producer or their agents, and I shall inform all people concerned.

8.  I shall forego the gratification of my ego for the demands of the play.

9.  I shall remember my business is to create illusion; therefore, I shall not break the illusion by appearing in costume and makeup off-stage or outside the theatre.

10.  I shall accept my director’s and producer’s advice and counsel in the spirit in which it is given, for they can see the production as a whole and my work from the front.

11.  I shall never “put on an act” while viewing other artists’ work as a member of an audience, nor shall I make caustic criticism from jealousy or for the sake of being smart.

12.  I shall respect the play and the playwright and, remembering that “a work of art is not a work of art until it is finished,” I shall not condemn a play while it is in rehearsal.

13.  I shall not spread rumor or gossip which is malicious and tends to reflect discredit on my show, the theatre, or any personnel connected with them—either to people inside or outside the group.

14.  Since I respect the theatre in which I work, I shall do my best to keep it looking clean, orderly and attractive regardless of whether I am specifically assigned to such work or not.

15.  I shall handle stage properties and costumes with care for I know they are part of the tools of my trade and are a vital part of the physical production.

16.  I shall follow rules of courtesy, deportment and common decency applicable in all walks of life (and especially in a business in close contact with the public) when I am in the theatre, and I shall observe the rules and regulations of any specific theatre where I work.

17.  I shall never lose my enthusiasm for theatre because of disappointments.

In addition, the document continued:
“I understand that membership in the Circle Theatre entitles me to the privilege of working, when I am so assigned, in any of the phases of a production, including:  props, lights, sound, construction, house management, box office, publicity and stage managing—as well as acting.  I realize it is possible I may not be cast in a part for many months, but I will not allow this to dampen my enthusiasm or desire to work, since I realize without my willingness to do all other phases of theatre work, there would be no theatre for me to act in.”

All members of the Circle Theatre were required to sign this document. And they must have—because the theatre, and the group into which it evolved, was successful for many years.


June 05, 2008

Audience Etiquette

I found this going through some of my computer files this morning.  It's the text of a sidebar I did for a local magazine a few years back.  Just thought I'd share:

Live Theatre Etiquette: The Top Ten Offenders

#10 THE ANTI-SOCIAL: Tell people about it! 

Get excited about being at the theatre and having the leisure to do such things right here in

Visalia

. After the show, discuss it with your companions or mention the show at work on Monday. You’ll look a lot more interesting to people!

#9 THE WANNA-BE: Respect the stage space
 Terri Wilson of Visalia was performing a tense scene in a play at Temple Theatre in Hanford when she looked down to discover an audience member had used the stage to elevate her broken leg. The plaster cast was sitting squarely between Wilson and her scene partner! Audience members at the Enchanted Playhouse and Ice House have been known to walk on the stage before shows, after shows and at intermission. If you’re tempted to do this, have you ever considered coming out for auditions? 

#8 THE WITHHOLDER: Respond!
Unlike film and television, the audience does have a part to play in the theatre. Your part is to let the actors know what you liked. Laugh at funny parts, cheer, applaud when you like something, shriek when you are scared. Don’t hold back!

#7 THE UNAPPRECIATIVE: Stay in your seat for the curtain call!
Those who head for the exit are basically leaving a dinner party before dessert and without even thanking their hosts. Tsk Tsk!

#6 THE UNINTERESTED: Listen!
Theatre is a language based artform. If you sit forward and listen carefully, you’ll catch even more humor or drama. Also, actors love intense listeners. There is a distinct difference between playing to an audience who is really paying attention and playing to crickets chirping. 

#5 THE UNINFORMED: Read the Program.
Arrive early enough to read the program so that you will have an idea of what to expect in the show-- especially if there is a director’s note. It will greatly help your appreciation of the world created on the stage.

#4 THE UNPREPARED: Take care of personal needs
For your own comfort, get to the restroom before the show starts and unwrap candies or cough drops ahead of time. And remember: a slowly opened candy wrapper is way more disruptive than one opened quickly. 

#3 THE INCONSIDERATE: Be considerate of those around you!
Try not to move around too much, and don’t talk during the performance. It disturbs the audience and actors alike. (One thing you should know about shows I direct: my actors have been given permission to address the audience directly should something wholly disruptive occur. It can make for great moments, as long as you aren’t the one doing the disrupting!)

#2 THE CELLPHONE ADDICT: Seriously, we mean it.
Turn it OFF. Check your voice mail at intermission if you need to do so. During my production of The Importance of Being Earnest at the Ice House Theatre, a woman behind me not only had her phone ring loudly, but then proceeded to answer the call and have a conversation right there during the performance. She didn’t even get up to go to the lobby. After a minute or so when I hoped she would end her conversation, I actually said, “Just one moment!” My actors, accustomed to my voice giving them directions, froze. I then turned and asked her firmly but politely to leave the house to great assent from her fellow patrons. That was when I established the policy in #3!

#1 THE LATECOMER: Be on time
Definitely the number one offense in

Visalia

theatre. Nearly every night of every show I’ve ever directed there have been people—often a group-- who enter late.  Ten, fifteen, twenty minutes late. If for some unforeseen circumstance you do arrive late, please don’t be surprised if you are seated at the back of the house so as not to disturb and disrespect those who managed to arrive on time. 

All in all, attending the theatre is about entering into a social artform that can enrich your life with thought, emotion, diversion and tremendous connection to your community. Find the time to commit to the experience fully and you’ll reap tremendous rewards in the long run. 

 

June 02, 2008

Twelfth Night: Dance Rehearsal

I wanted to make sure I got a blog entry up about Sunday's dance rehearsal. 

I've got to say, I don't think I've ever done a dance rehearsal for a show-- especially with non-dancer actors-- where it was such a pleasure and a joy.  All of these actors had a long and arduous day prior to the rehearsal helping to build the new, semi-permanent stage in the Woodward Park Glen.  They were tired and had a rehearsal call on a Sunday afternoon, which no one really likes.

But during the rehearsal, even with the heat, half built set, sore muscles, and late arrivals, everyone was on board for whatever I asked them to do.  I heard no grousing about being written out of a dance, as a few gentlemen had to be.  There were no complaints about having to get up off of their asses.  There was no resistance to my direction and suggestions during the dumb show (an old-school theatrical conceit that a lot of actors look down on as being quaint and antiquated).  In fact, everyone rolled with the time they had to sit out a dance and those that danced every dance stayed focused and worked each set the best they knew how.
Because of this tremendous positivity and professionalism among this cast, they managed to learn two new 1 and a half to two minute dances in just about two hours.  And for non-dancers, that's really some good work. 

Because these actors didn't feel that any part of this process was beneath them or their performance in this show, I think the bookending of the dances and dumbshow will be a strong and well-executed image for teh production-- instead of an afterthought as I've seen in other local productions in recent years.  For me, a girl who loves the vintage dances of the 16th-19th centuries, to have actors so wholly unacquainted with the artform embrace it so well and not feel like coming to this rehearsal was beneath them was a real blessing.

And so, I've uploaded three videos of the rehearsals of the dances and dumb show to my YouTube account.  (When viewing, please bear in mind that these are still early dance rehearsals-- our second one total-- and the first time they've learned two of these pieces.  We have some work to do, but right now, these actors are doing great!)

PS: I have a few new costume snaps on my flickr album. I'll keep a running total on the photostream.