A whole lotta theatre going on.
So,
both of my theatre jobs are fully underway. Last night I put forth a
cycle of plays for the Raisin Cain Players in Selma and it was
universally admired and will be scheduled perfectly for the year. So
my life as a director producer swings between Shakespeare for the
masses to commercial plays for a small community. I actually like that
blend of things.
The one thing I've insisted on for the Selma
job is that the scripts be superior. One of my strengths as a
commercial director is my taste in scripts. I know how to choose
really good ones-- script that are a pleasure to direct and act, and
therefore a pleasure to watch. A superior script is also better for
amateur actors in that since things are clearer, more purposeful, and
less dodgy, there is something for amateur actors to grab onto and run
with. A mediocre book leads to a lot of muddy, bad acting choices that
I, as a director, have trouble fighting against.
With the
Shakespeare. . . well, it's Shakespeare. Which doesn't mean it is
perfect or not problematic (ever tried to stage the ending of Measure
for Measure and make it satisfying?). But the productions should have
a strong understanding of the text and the concepts should support the
text and not be grafted on top of it. It is definitely harder to
produce with amateur actors, but that's part of the challenge!
So,
anyway, for the next however-long I get the joy of working some lovely
commercial scripts that I've wanted to do for a while and some
challenging Shakespeare that always charges me up. :D
The shows on the books right now are:
The Foreigner (directing and producing, runs May 2009)
As You Like It (producing. . . I might audition, too. It seems to be a habit with me, that show. Runs, June-July 2009).
Richard III (producing, runs August-September, 2009)
The Canterville Ghost (directing and producing, runs October 2009)
A Christmas Carol (directing and producing, runs December 2009-- opens on my birthday)
Annie (directing and producing, runs May, 2010)
And then, of course, we arrive at the unknown WSF 2010 season, where, mayhap I'll direct? We'll see!
*note.
.. I use the term "commercial" loosely. . Shakespeare can and is very
commercial in that there's a built-in audience for it. But commercial
to me is anything sellable in a relatively traditional theatre format
that is accessible to a pretty broad audience-- even if they've never
heard of the show. Godot doesn't qualify for me (interest and general
accessibility factor) and neither do a lot of the Fringe Festival
entries. Turn of the Screw did, because it was sellable, accessible,
and yet superior in its script-- even in its non-traditional staging.
Anyway. . . We could have discussions for days about the meaning of the
words "commercial", "accessible", "non-profit", "audience friendly" and
how they relate to superior scripts and where and when and how those
shows belong in the world. Mostly, I just want to avoid mediocrity in
the scripts I stage and well-made theater is nearly always "commercial"
in some form.